Page 1 of 1

Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: January 10th, 2018, 9:37 am
by Dzidefo
Dear Cspro Team,

Hi, I am using CSPro 7.0.2 and find differences between the PC CSEntry and the CSEntry Android application.

To make easy the navigation within the application, I introduce the function :
set behavior() canenter(notappl) on (noconfirm) and set behavior() canenter(notappl) off; at the appropriate place.

The application works exactly as programmed on the PC. But when a run it on my android device,
sometimes, it add and show the value "notappl" at the valueset of some items.
When I test the application on the PC i haven't that situation any more.

Somebody can explain me what happens ?

Thanks

Re: Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: January 10th, 2018, 10:29 am
by khurshid.arshad
Dear;

Right-click on the field and select "Field Property" and uncheck the option "Force Out-of-Range".

Now you will not see "Notappl" option on your android version.

Best.
a.

Re: Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: December 13th, 2018, 3:14 pm
by nousra
Dear All,

I have the same problem in csentry. "Force out of range" is not check and the persists.
Thanks

Re: Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: December 13th, 2018, 4:13 pm
by nousra
Dear All,

I have the same problem in csentry. "Force out of range" is not check and the problem persists.
Thanks

Re: Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: December 17th, 2018, 8:56 am
by Gregory Martin
You are posting to a very old topic, so I'm not sure exactly which problem you're facing. What version of CSPro are you using? Are you wanting "NotAppl" to show up in the list of values, or not?

Re: Notappl//Difference between Csentry PC and Android appl

Posted: December 18th, 2018, 3:00 am
by nousra
I am using CSpro 7.1
The problem was with this function :
set behavior() canenter(notappl) on (noconfirm) and set behavior() canenter(notappl) off

the problem was solved when i change the function.

Thanks for your response