Search found 63 matches
- March 25th, 2018, 9:23 pm
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Multiple answer skip-pattern
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3715
Re: Multiple answer skip-pattern
Hi Ces, For question 1, you can add a code like this: PROC VAR1 if VAR1[1:1] not in "a", "b", "c", "v", "", or VAR1[2:1] not in "a", "b", "c", "v", "", or VAR1[3:1] not in "a", "b"...
- November 16th, 2017, 1:31 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: repeat count for household roster form
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7146
Re: repeat count for household roster form
What will happen for twins of same sex, education and occupation?
- October 4th, 2017, 1:58 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Different lang
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3564
Re: Different lang
Hi,
Not sure I understand your question very well. If you seek to turn off the text of the value labels, the SET ATTRIBUTES statement can be used for that so you can check the documentation on the SET ATTRIBUTES.
Not sure I understand your question very well. If you seek to turn off the text of the value labels, the SET ATTRIBUTES statement can be used for that so you can check the documentation on the SET ATTRIBUTES.
- September 29th, 2017, 4:44 am
- Forum: Android
- Topic: Weird roaster behaviour
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4175
Re: Weird roaster behaviour
Eshan,
Is your application in operator control mode? Is there information in the extra occurrences or just that the cursor moves to those lines?
Is your application in operator control mode? Is there information in the extra occurrences or just that the cursor moves to those lines?
- September 10th, 2017, 9:03 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Random Questions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5840
Re: Random Questions
I did something similar before, but settle for systematic sampling of the questions. So I only needed to pick the first question randomly (using systime ranges) and then the subsequent questions were determined.
- June 25th, 2017, 7:24 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: How to resolve entry message (W 92101)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2613
Re: How to resolve entry message (W 92101)
Hi,
Make sure you have dropped all the ID variables in the dictionary on the forms before you try the entry. The message suggests that you ID variables have not been added on any forms so you get an empty caseid for each case.
Make sure you have dropped all the ID variables in the dictionary on the forms before you try the entry. The message suggests that you ID variables have not been added on any forms so you get an empty caseid for each case.
- May 10th, 2017, 4:09 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Separate boxes for subitems
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5511
Re: Separate boxes for subitems
Did you drag the whole record to the form or you drag item by item? I would suggest you delete the item with the six boxes from the form, and drag the subitems one at a time by themselves to the form. Hopefully this should work.
- May 3rd, 2017, 8:51 pm
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Logging operator ID with cases entered
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10436
Re: Logging operator ID with cases entered
I think its because you have the PREPROC on the PROC QUEST instead of having it on the OPERATOR_ID variable PROC.
Re: Dynamic
Hi,
That is possible with the DYNAMIC VALUESET options. You can read up in the help or check out an example from this document posted by Josh sometime back on this platform: http://teleyah.com/cspro/DCJune2015/04-CAPI/04-CAPI.pdf
That is possible with the DYNAMIC VALUESET options. You can read up in the help or check out an example from this document posted by Josh sometime back on this platform: http://teleyah.com/cspro/DCJune2015/04-CAPI/04-CAPI.pdf
- April 30th, 2017, 10:36 am
- Forum: Entry
- Topic: Logging operator ID with cases entered
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10436
Re: Logging operator ID with cases entered
Hi Mike, Are you doing entry in the office or its a CAPI program? How are the files structured: will different operators be entering into the same file or strictly one file per enumerator. If its one file per enumerator (per cluster), then its safer to go with the operator ID as a variable and make ...